635A Garratt Lane, London SW18 4SX
LON/00BJ/LSC/2023/0048 · service charges · Wandsworth · decided 31 Aug 2023
The tribunal allowed a set-off of £5,664 for roof repairs and internal damage against the advance service charges, disallowed the 2021/22 major works item and a £360 solicitors' administration charge, and found £9,438.87 payable for 2021/22 and 2022/23.
| Outcome | Reduced |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not clear |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | Shaftesbury DC Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat, 3 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2021, 2022 |
| Items in dispute | administration charges, insurance, legal and professional fees, major works, management fees, repairs and maintenance, reserve fund |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | £15,102.87 |
| Total found payable | £9,438.87 |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
There are three flats spanning the ground, first and second floors.
- freeholder
Respondent : Shaftesbury DC Limited
- years
The applicant submitted a previous s.27A application in September 2022, seeking a determination of advance service charges for 2021/22.
- outcome
The Tribunal determines that the following service charges are payable by the applicant to the respondent:
- total demanded
£15,102.87
- total payable
£9,438.87
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.