63 Pentridge Street, London SE15 6JE
LON/00BE/LSC/2019/0203 · service charges · Southwark · decided 9 Sep 2019
The tribunal determined that the estimated service charges of £4,375.95 for 2015/16 and 2016/17 for heating main renewal works are payable in full, and the remaining county court costs and account balance are referred back to the County Court.
| Outcome | Payable as demanded |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2015, 2016 |
| Items in dispute | other |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | £4,375.95 |
| Total found payable | £4,375.95 |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- years
service charge years 1 April 2015-31 March 2106 and 1 April 2016-31 March 2017
- outcome
The tribunal determines that the sum of £4,375.95 is payable by the Respondent in respect of the estimated service charges for the years 2015/6 and 2016/7.
- total demanded
The tribunal determines that the amount payable in respect of service charges is £4,375.95.
- total payable
The tribunal determines that the amount payable in respect of service charges is £4,375.95.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
This decision replaces an earlier one for the same case: 12 Aug 2019.
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.