62c High Street, Cheshunt, Hertfordshire EN8 0AH

CAM/26UB/LSC/2019/0017 · service charges · Broxbourne · decided 30 Aug 2019

figures not yet checked

The tribunal found the 2015 to 2018 service charges payable only in reduced amounts, removing a roof scaffolding charge, professional fees, plumbing, a repair invoice for another flat and insurance premiums not in joint names, cut management fees to £200 plus VAT per unit, and made a section 20C order protecting leaseholders from the landlord's costs of the case.

Outcome	Reduced
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)	Order made
Section 20 consultation	Not in issue
Who applied	Leaseholder(s)
Freeholder / landlord	Sigma Property Co Ltd
Management company	none named
Managing agent	none named
Building	A block
Service charge years in dispute	2014, 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018
Items in dispute	administration charges, cleaning and grounds, insurance, legal and professional fees, major works, management fees, other, repairs and maintenance, reserve fund, utilities
Items disallowed or reduced	insurance, legal and professional fees, major works, management fees, repairs and maintenance
Total demanded	not stated as one figure
Total found payable	not stated as one figure
Fees or costs ordered	none stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

flats n: It comprises 5 retail units on the ground floor and 5 duplex maisonettes on the first and second floors
freeholder: Respondent (Landlord): Sigma Property Co Ltd
years: financial years ending 23rd June 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017 and 2018
outcome: Roof Works 85,239.18 Reduced by £600
items reduced: Management 2,400.00 2,400.00 2,400.00 2,400.00 Reduced to £200 + VAT per unit
s20c: the Tribunal makes an Order under section 20C of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 that the Respondent’s costs in connection with these proceedings should not be regarded as relevant costs

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.