62 Rydal Way, South Ruislip, Middlesex, HA4 0RU
LON/00AS/LSC/2024/0116 · service charges · Hillingdon · decided 27 Aug 2024
The tribunal struck out most of the disputed estate, accounts and garage items, found two 10% insurance administration charges and a £27 brickwork charge for 2023 not due, and refused a section 20C order.
| Outcome | Reduced |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Refused |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | A. J. A. Taylor and Company Ltd |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Sebright Property Management Limited |
| Building | A block, 4 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2022, 2023 |
| Items in dispute | insurance, other, repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | insurance, repairs and maintenance |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
Respondent : A. J. A. [name] and Company Ltd
- agent
a director of Sebright Property Management Limited, which undertakes management of various properties on the estate
- years
The application seeks to challenge service charges in 2022 and 2023.
- outcome
is not due and owing
- items reduced
is not due and owing
- s20c
The Tribunal therefore does not make an order under s.20C.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.