61 Ashville Road, Prenton, Birkenhead CH43 8SA
MAN/00CB/LSC/2017/0062 · service charges · Wirral · decided 10 Jan 2023
The tribunal refused the applicant's request to withdraw, reduced several 2019/20 to 2021/22 service charge items for CCTV, electrical works, s20 works and gardening, and made a section 20C order limiting the landlord's recoverable proceedings costs to 90%.
| Outcome | Reduced |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Order made |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Breezedown Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 7 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2019, 2020, 2021 |
| Items in dispute | cleaning and grounds, major works, management fees, repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | cleaning and grounds, major works, repairs and maintenance |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
has been converted into 7 flats arranged as follows
- freeholder
Applicant : Breezedown Limited
- years
for the years 2019/20, 2020/21 and
- outcome
are reduced by £222 in the 2020/21 service charge year
- items reduced
the costs of £419 for the 2020/2021 service charge year are reduced to £121
- s20c
limiting the right of the Applicant to charge as service charge costs incurred by it
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.