60 Lipton Road, London, E1 0LJ
LON/00BG/LSC/2025/1040 · service charges · Tower Hamlets · decided 16 Feb 2026
The leaseholder agreed to pay the service charge arrears of £1,728.64, so the tribunal had no jurisdiction on those, and the £112.50 administration charges were not determined because the claim was not correctly pleaded.
| Outcome | Withdrawn |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2023 |
| Items in dispute | administration charges |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | £5,059.82 |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | Applicant will not seek to recover its tribunal costs; County Court to decide other costs |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- years
Service Charges 2023-25 £5059.82
- outcome
By reason of the Respondent’s agreement to pay the outstanding balance for the service charge arrears, the Tribunal was satisfied that it no longer had any jurisdiction
- total demanded
Service Charges 2023-25 £5059.82
- costs
The Applicant confirmed that it would not be seeking to recover any costs it had incurred in the Tribunal proceedings.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.