60 Brooks Mews, Aylesbury, Bucks HP19 8FU
CAM/11UB/LSC/2020/0026 · service charges · Buckinghamshire · decided 16 Nov 2020
The tribunal dismissed the leaseholder's challenge to the management fees charged by Catalyst Housing Ltd and its agent FirstPort for 2015/16 to 2020/21, and made an order under section 20C preventing Catalyst from adding its costs of the proceedings to the service charge.
| Outcome | Dismissed or struck out |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Order made |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | Catalyst Housing Ltd |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | FirstPort Property Services Ltd |
| Building | An estate, 75 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2015, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020 |
| Items in dispute | management fees |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
The estate as a whole, comprising 75 units, is owned freehold by the respondent housing association
- freeholder
Respondent : Catalyst Housing Ltd
- agent
managing agent FirstPort Property Services Ltd
- years
for the years 2015/16 to 2020/21
- outcome
That the application under section 27A concerning management fees be dismissed
- s20c
shall not be entitled to include the costs of defending this application when calculating the service charge payable
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.