Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Decisions near RM7 8LL

6 Winston Close, Romford, Essex, RM7 8LL

LON/00AR/LSC/2021/0025 · service charges · Havering · decided 4 Apr 2022

figures not yet checked

The tribunal found that none of the service charges claimed for March 2018 to March 2021 are due because the demands were not accompanied by a summary of rights and obligations as required by section 21B, and it made a section 20C order in the leaseholder's favour.

OutcomeNot payable
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Order made
Section 20 consultationNot in issue
Who appliedLeaseholder(s)
Freeholder / landlordnot a company, or not stated
Management companynone named
Managing agentRespondents Charles David Casson Limited
BuildingOne flat
Service charge years in dispute2018, 2019, 2020, 2021
Items in disputenot stated
Items disallowed or reducednone stated
Total demanded£4,500.68
Total found payablenot stated as one figure
Fees or costs orderednone stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

freeholder
The landlord is Florey Investments Limited.
years
for March 2018, March 2019, March 2020 and March 2021.
outcome
the Tribunal determines that none of the sums claimed for the period in question namely March 2018 to March 2021 inclusive ( a total sum of £4500. 68) are due.
total demanded
The total value of the dispute is £4500.68.
total payable
the Tribunal determines that none of the sums claimed for the period in question namely March 2018 to March 2021 inclusive ( a total sum of £4500. 68) are due.
s20c
the Tribunal determines that it will exercise its discretion in favour of the Applicant in relation to section 20C of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.