Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Decisions near NW3 7SP

6 Kidderpore Avenue, London NW3 7SP

LON/00AG/LRM/2024/0600 · right to manage · Camden · decided 9 Oct 2025

The tribunal ordered RTMF Services Ltd, the applicant's representative, to pay the respondent £9,000 in wasted costs after it sent a misdated email about a late statement of case, and dismissed the respondent's wasted costs claim against the applicant.

OutcomeOther decision
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Not applied for
Section 20 consultationNot in issue
Who appliedRTM company
Freeholder / landlord6 Kidderpore Avenue Ltd
Management companynone named
Managing agentnone named
BuildingA block
Service charge years in disputenot stated
Items in disputenot stated
Items disallowed or reducednone stated
Total demanded£25,192.08
Total found payablenot stated as one figure
Fees or costs orderedRTMF Services Ltd (the applicant's representative) to pay the respondent wasted costs of £9,000 inclusive of VAT

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

freeholder
Respondent : 6 Kidderpore Avenue Ltd
outcome
RTMF Services Ltd shall pay to the Respondent wasted costs summarily assessed in the sum of £9,000, inclusive of VAT.
costs
RTMF Services Ltd shall pay to the Respondent wasted costs summarily assessed in the sum of £9,000, inclusive of VAT.

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

This decision replaces an earlier one for the same case: 16 Jun 2025.

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.