6 Kidderpore Avenue, London NW3 7SP
LON/00AG/LRM/2024/0600 · right to manage · Camden · decided 9 Oct 2025
The tribunal ordered RTMF Services Ltd, the applicant's representative, to pay the respondent £9,000 in wasted costs after it sent a misdated email about a late statement of case, and dismissed the respondent's wasted costs claim against the applicant.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | RTM company |
| Freeholder / landlord | 6 Kidderpore Avenue Ltd |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | not stated |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | £25,192.08 |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | RTMF Services Ltd (the applicant's representative) to pay the respondent wasted costs of £9,000 inclusive of VAT |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
Respondent : 6 Kidderpore Avenue Ltd
- outcome
RTMF Services Ltd shall pay to the Respondent wasted costs summarily assessed in the sum of £9,000, inclusive of VAT.
- costs
RTMF Services Ltd shall pay to the Respondent wasted costs summarily assessed in the sum of £9,000, inclusive of VAT.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
This decision replaces an earlier one for the same case: 16 Jun 2025.
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.