6 Fortuneswell Court, 2 Moorland Road, Didsbury, Manchester, M20 6LS
MAN/00BN/LSC/2018/0073 · service charges · Manchester · decided 18 Jun 2019
The tribunal found the 2018/19 service charge payable to be £1,484.53, less than the £1,804.98 charged per property, after reducing the communal cleaning, grounds maintenance, emergency lighting maintenance and gutter cleaning costs.
| Outcome | Reduced |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | Equity Housing Group Ltd. |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2018 |
| Items in dispute | cleaning and grounds, repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | cleaning and grounds, repairs and maintenance |
| Total demanded | £1,804.98 |
| Total found payable | £1,484.53 |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
the registered proprietor of the freehold property
- years
the service charge payable by the applicant for 2018/19 is £1,484.53.
- outcome
We find that the service charge payable for 2018/19 is £1,484.53.
- items reduced
we find that it is reasonable to allow £321.00 based on the previous year.
- total demanded
charge per property £1,804.98 £1,484.53
- total payable
We find that the service charge payable for 2018/19 is £1,484.53.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.