6 Brompton House, East Approach Drive, Cheltenham GL52 3JE
HAV/23UB/LBC/2025/0608 · breach of lease · Cheltenham · decided 31 Jul 2025
The Tribunal determined that the leaseholder breached clause 3.14 of her lease between 21 May 2024 and 31 July 2024 by allowing her daughter to remain at the flat while she caused nuisance to neighbours, but found no breach for the February 2025 return and no admission of breach.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Brompton House Property Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat, 8 flats · 2 decisions about this building |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | not stated |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | respondent to reimburse tribunal fees of £330 to the applicant |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
Brompton House comprises eight self-contained flats all held under long leases
- freeholder
Brompton House Property Limited (‘the Applicant’) is the freehold owner of Brompton House
- outcome
the following breaches have occurred
- costs
the Tribunal is minded to order the Respondent to pay the Applicant the tribunal fees paid by the Applicant in the sum of £330
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.