6-7 Egerton Gardens, London SW3 2BS
LON/00AW/LDC/2021/0076 · dispensation from consultation · Kensington and Chelsea · decided 3 Jun 2021
The tribunal granted retrospective dispensation from the s.20 consultation requirements only for the N-Compass London Limited invoice of £8220 plus VAT for works to the building, refusing dispensation for the unevidenced Vesta claim, subject to conditions on serving the application and decision on leaseholders.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | The Wellcome Trust Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Savills (UK) Ltd |
| Building | A block, 14 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
converted into 14 flats
- freeholder
The Freeholder is The Wellcome Trust Limited.
- agent
Their managing agents are [name] (UK) Ltd.
- outcome
The Tribunal grants the applicant retrospective dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements
- s20
The Tribunal grants the applicant retrospective dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.