6, 7 & 12 Kenbury Mansions, Kenbury Street, London SE5 9BU
LON/00AY/LSC/2024/0738 · service charges · Lambeth · decided 12 Aug 2025
The tribunal found the council's major works charges largely reasonable and payable, but reduced the scaffolding figure and cut the management fee from 10% to 5%, with the council refunding half the application fees.
| Outcome | Reduced |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not clear |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 12 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023 |
| Items in dispute | major works, management fees, repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | major works, management fees |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | respondent to refund half the fees paid by the applicants, set off against the sum found owing |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
containing flats numbered 1 to 12
- years
major works in the period 2019 to 2023
- outcome
the amount that is being claimed for scaffolding should be reduced from £64,266.70 to a rounded figure of £57,940
- items reduced
the amount that is being claimed for scaffolding should be reduced from £64,266.70 to a rounded figure of £57,940
- costs
the Council would refund half the fees paid by the Applicants
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.