5c Hartham Road, London, N7 9JQ
LON/00AU/LSC/2024/0705 · service charges · Islington · decided 9 Jun 2025
The tribunal found the estimated 2024 to 2025 service charges of £1,655.93 and the administration charges of £850 for legal work on arrears reasonable and payable, the respondent having been barred from participating.
| Outcome | Payable as demanded |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Five Hartham Road Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat, 3 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2024 |
| Items in dispute | administration charges |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | £1,655.93 |
| Total found payable | £1,655.93 |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
comprises a building containing three self-contained flats
- freeholder
Applicant : Five Hartham Road Limited
- years
estimated service charges for the year 2024 to 2025 in the sum of £1,655.93 are reasonable and payable
- outcome
The estimated service charges for the year 2024 to 2025 in the sum of £1,655.93 are reasonable and payable.
- total demanded
estimated service charges for the year 2024 to 2025 in the sum of £1,655.93
- total payable
The estimated service charges for the year 2024 to 2025 in the sum of £1,655.93 are reasonable and payable.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.