5a, 9a, 11a & 13a West Street, Reigate, Surrey RH2 9BL
HAV/43UK/LDC/2026/0011 · dispensation from consultation · Reigate and Banstead · decided 24 Jul 2026
The Tribunal granted the Applicant limited dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements for electrical and fire safety works, on condition that the Applicant cannot recover the costs of the dispensation application from leaseholders.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Magnate Estates Ltd |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 14 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2025 |
| Items in dispute | other |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | the applicant may not recover its costs of this application from the respondents through the service charge or otherwise |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
with 14 residential flats above
- freeholder
Applicant : Magnate Estates Ltd
- outcome
The Tribunal grants the Applicant limited dispensation
- s20
The Tribunal grants the Applicant limited dispensation
- costs
this application are not recoverable from the Respondents, whether through the service charge or otherwise
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.