59G Edith Grove, London, SW10 0LB

LON/00AW/LSC/2019/0105 · service charges · Kensington and Chelsea · decided 27 Sep 2019

figures not yet checked

The tribunal reduced the roofing charge and the preliminary costs for the major works, approved the 9.13% professional fees, found the section 20 consultation not flawed, made a section 20C order, and ordered the landlord to refund £300 in fees.

Outcome	Reduced
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)	Order made
Section 20 consultation	Not in issue
Who applied	Leaseholder(s)
Freeholder / landlord	not a company, or not stated
Management company	none named
Managing agent	none named
Building	One flat, 5 flats
Service charge years in dispute	2013
Items in dispute	legal and professional fees, major works, management fees
Items disallowed or reduced	major works
Total demanded	not stated as one figure
Total found payable	not stated as one figure
Fees or costs ordered	the respondent to refund the applicant's application and hearing fees of £300

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

flats n: There are five flats in the communal area
years: carried out as major works in 2013
outcome: is not fair and reasonable and is reduced by the Tribunal to the sum of £2936.95
items reduced: is not fair and reasonable and is reduced by the Tribunal to the sum of £2936.95
s20c: tribunal makes an order pursuant to the terms of s.20c
costs: The Tribunal orders that the respondent do refund the applicant’s

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.