59 Webbscroft Road, Dagenham, Essex, RM10 7NL
LON/00AB/LSC/2023/0326 · service charges · Barking and Dagenham · decided 31 Jan 2024
figures not yet checkedThe tribunal found that the service charge demands were received and are payable, including a £1000 surcharge and insurance increases, except for an overpayment of £335.70 which the respondent accepted is owed back, and it refused the applicant's section 20C application.
| Outcome | Payable as demanded |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Refused |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | Salisbury Place (Dagenham) Management Company Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2020, 2021 |
| Items in dispute | insurance, other |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | £6,314.09 |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
The Respondent to the application is Salisbury Place (Dagenham) Management Company Limited a leaseholder company.
- years
In 2020 -2021 he says that he was not sent a service charge demand letter
- outcome
All of the sums claimed by the Respondents are due save for the overpaid sum of £335.70.
- total demanded
the total value of the dispute is said to be £6314.09
- s20c
Both applications are refused.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.