58 Queens Gardens, London, W2 3AF
LON/00BK/LDC/2025/0975 · dispensation from consultation · Westminster · decided 4 Feb 2026
The tribunal refused the landlord company's application to dispense with the section 20 consultation requirements for proposed urgent safety and repair works at the building, so full consultation must be carried out.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation refused |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | 58 Queens Gardens Freehold Ltd. |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat, 6 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | insurance, other, repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | the applicant will meet all of its costs arising from the making and determination of this application; these may be rec |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
converted into 6 flats in 1980
- freeholder
Landlord : 58 [name] Gardens Freehold Ltd.
- outcome
The Tribunal does NOT grant dispensation from the requirements on the applicant to consult all leaseholders under S.20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
- s20
This application for dispensation is refused.
- costs
The applicant will meet all of its costs arising from the making and determination of this application.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.