Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Decisions near B1 3EA

58-60 Albion Street, Birmingham B1 3EA

BIR/00CN/LLC/2020/0001 · LLC · Birmingham · decided 17 Sep 2020

figures not yet checked

The tribunal appointed a professional manager from the applicants' proposed firm, Principle Estate Management, to manage the property in place of the respondent's nominee, and made an order under section 20C that the landlord's costs of the proceedings cannot be added to the service charge.

OutcomeOther decision
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Order made
Section 20 consultationNot in issue
Who appliedLeaseholder(s)
Freeholder / landlordMTH Properties Limited
Management companynone named
Managing agentnone named
BuildingA block, 8 flats · 2 decisions about this building
Service charge years in disputenot stated
Items in disputeinsurance, management fees, repairs and maintenance, reserve fund
Items disallowed or reducedmanagement fees
Total demandednot stated as one figure
Total found payablenot stated as one figure
Fees or costs orderednone stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

flats n
3 of the 8 leaseholders at the Property
freeholder
Respondent : MTH Properties Limited
outcome
In accordance with section 24(1) Landlord and Tenant Act 1987, Mr
s20c
In light of this concession, and the success of the Applicants, an order under Section 20C follows.

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.