57 Maxwell Road, Bournemouth, Dorset BH9 1DQ
CHI/00HN/LSC/2021/0012 · service charges · Bournemouth, Christchurch and Poole · decided 9 Sep 2021
figures not yet checkedThe tribunal found the roof replacement and related service charges payable in full, rejected the leaseholders' claimed right of set off, and made no costs order.
| Outcome | Payable as demanded |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Refused |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2018 |
| Items in dispute | insurance, legal and professional fees, major works, repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | £14,301 |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- years
for the years 1st April 2018 until 31st March 2021
- outcome
we have determined that all of the costs are reasonable and costs properly recoverable by way of service charge payments
- total demanded
service charges in the sum of £14,301
- s20c
Taking all matters into account we exercise our discretion and decline to make any orders as to costs in this case.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.