56a Grosvenor Avenue, London, N5 2NR
LON/00AU/LSC/2025/0747 · service charges · Islington · decided 10 Sep 2025
figures not yet checkedThe tribunal decided the leaseholder is not liable to pay £3,809.27 for redecorating the communal corridors and landing, as she has no use of those areas, and the council must repay her £337 fees and cannot recover its costs of the case.
| Outcome | Not stated |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Order made |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2023 |
| Items in dispute | major works |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | £3,809.27 |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | respondent to reimburse the applicant fees of £337 |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- years
charged in the 2023-4 major works final statement
- total demanded
£3,809.27 charged in the 2023-4 major works final statement
- s20c
the Tribunal makes an order under section 20C of the Act
- costs
the Tribunal orders the Respondent to reimburse the Applicant the fees of £337 she has paid to have the application issued and heard
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.