56 & 84 Friars Wharf Apartments, Green Lane Gateshead NE10 0QX
MAN/00CH/LSC/2022/0022 · service charges · Gateshead · decided 2 Dec 2022
The Tribunal found that only £417.56 per flat of the £1,177.21 balancing demands for 2019/20 was payable once credit notes for communal electricity were taken into account, and refused the request that the landlord's costs of the application be excluded from the service charge.
| Outcome | Substantially reduced |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Refused |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | Adriatic Land 5 Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Zenith Management Limited |
| Building | A block, 85 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2019 |
| Items in dispute | utilities |
| Items disallowed or reduced | utilities |
| Total demanded | £2,354.42 |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
The Building is a purpose built block of 85 flats.
- freeholder
Respondent : [name] 5 Limited
- agent
Bradley Hall were replaced by Zenith Management Limited
- years
for the year 01.04.2019 to 31.03.2020
- outcome
(originally £1177.21 per property)
- items reduced
regarding communal electricity costs.
- total demanded
(combined total £2,354.42)
- s20c
The Tribunal refuses the Applicant’s application under Section 20C Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.