55A Marine Parade, Brighton, BN2 1PH
CHI/00HC/LSC/2022/0017 · service charges · Brighton and Hove · decided 15 Mar 2023
figures not yet checkedThe tribunal found the on-account service charge of £1204.47 for 2016-2017 payable and reasonable, the respondent could not set off his counterclaim against estimated charges, and the £4951.01 balance was not shown to be payable.
| Outcome | Payable as demanded |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2016 |
| Items in dispute | other |
| Items disallowed or reduced | other |
| Total demanded | £1,204.47 |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
subsequently divided into seventeen flats
- years
the 2016- 2017 accounting year
- outcome
The Residential Lease service charges claimed by the Applicant in the proceedings are payable and reasonable in the sum of £1204.47
- items reduced
the £4951.01 is not, on the evidence presented, payable
- total demanded
£1204.47 is said to be the sum payable on 1st October 2016
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.