55 Willow Bank, Telford, TF4 3SG
BIR/00GF/LIS/2018/0040 · LIS · Telford and Wrekin · decided 25 Feb 2019
The tribunal decided that the disputed service charges are not payable to either Tapestart Ltd or HLM Property Management, because HLM had no legal basis to demand them from the leaseholder.
| Outcome | Not payable |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | Tapestart Ltd |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Countrywide Residential Lettings Ltd t/a HLM Property Management |
| Building | One flat |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2015, 2017, 2018 |
| Items in dispute | other, repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
Tapestart Ltd (1)
- agent
Countrywide Residential Lettings Ltd t/a HLM Property Management (2)
- years
service charge years 2015/16 (£1,080.92 in dispute), 2017/19 (£3,659.06 in dispute) and 2018/19
- outcome
The Disputed Charges are not payable to HLM as they have no contractual relationship with the Applicant on which they can base an entitlement to levy service charges
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.