54 Lupin Point, Abbey Street, London SE1 2DW
LON/00BE/LSC/2020/0256 · service charges · Southwark · decided 8 Apr 2021
The tribunal found the Tenant liable to pay the estimated major works service charges of £13,863.70, rejecting his challenges on asbestos provision, scaffolding costs, consultation and the offer of instalments, and ordered him to reimburse the £200 hearing fee.
| Outcome | Payable as demanded |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2019 |
| Items in dispute | major works |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | £13,863.70 |
| Total found payable | £13,863.70 |
| Fees or costs ordered | Respondent to reimburse hearing fee £200.00 to the Landlord |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- years
In the year ending March 2019 the amount is £13,602.13. In the year ending March 2020 the balance is £261.571.
- outcome
The Tenant is liable to pay the following sum by way of service charges: £13,863.70.
- total demanded
The estimated costs which the Tenant is being asked to pay as at the date of the hearing amount to £13,863.70.
- total payable
The Tenant is liable to pay the following sum by way of service charges: £13,863.70.
- costs
The Tenant is also liable to reimburse to the Landlord the hearing fee of £200.00.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.