54 Arbour Square, London, E1 0PS
LON/00BG/LSC/2021/0026 · service charges · Tower Hamlets · decided 5 Nov 2021
figures not yet checkedThe tribunal found the insurance premiums for 2015/16 to 2021/22 reasonable and payable, reduced the 2017/18 roof hatch repair charge by half to £234.16, and the disputed £250 block repair charge for 2019/20 was not payable.
| Outcome | Reduced |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not clear |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2015, 2021 |
| Items in dispute | insurance, repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | repairs and maintenance |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- years
The Tribunal determines that the sums demanded in respect of insurance for the service charge years 2015/6 to 2021/2 are both payable and chargeable.
- outcome
We are therefore satisfied that a proper repair was not executed and reduce the sum demanded by 50% to £234.16.
- items reduced
The Tribunal reduces the sum claimed in respect of repairs in 2017/8 by 50% namely from £468.32 to £234.16.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.