52A and 52B Portree Street London E14 0HT
LON/00BG/LDC/2021/0019 · dispensation from consultation · Tower Hamlets · decided 21 Apr 2021
The tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements for urgent remedial roof works at the two-unit converted house, with no determination yet on whether the costs are payable or reasonable.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Resonance Ltd |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Warwick Estates |
| Building | A block, 2 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
The Property is described in the application as a small converted house of two units.
- agent
Representative : Warwick Estates ([name])
- outcome
The Tribunal grants the application for dispensation from statutory consultation in respect of the subject works, namely remedial works to the roof of the property.
- s20
The Tribunal grants the application for dispensation from statutory consultation in respect of the subject works, namely remedial works to the roof of the property.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.