52 Field Street, Heath Town, Wolverhampton, WV10 0JH
BIR/00CW/LIS/2021/0021 · LIS · Wolverhampton · decided 10 Dec 2021
The tribunal found the weekly service charges for 2015/16 to 2021/22 payable and reasonable after deducting boundary fencing costs from 2017/18 and 2019/20, and ordered that the landlord's litigation costs are not to be added to the service charge and the litigation administration charge is extinguished.
| Outcome | Reduced |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Order made |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Other |
| Freeholder / landlord | Nehemiah United Churches Housing Association Ltd |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | An estate, 12 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2015 |
| Items in dispute | cleaning and grounds, management fees, other, repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | management fees, repairs and maintenance |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
namely 12 flats which are contained within 3 separate blocks and 71 houses
- freeholder
The Respondent owns the Estate and is the Landlord of the Property.
- years
2015/6 0.94
- outcome
We therefore deduct £1692, and £1512
- items reduced
We therefore deduct £1692, and £1512
- s20c
We order that the Respondent’s costs in connection with these proceedings are not to be regarded as relevant costs to be taken into account
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.