52-58 (Even) Commercial Road, London E1 1LP
LON/00BG/LRM/2020/0025 · right to manage · Tower Hamlets · decided 26 Aug 2021
The tribunal ordered the RTM company to pay the freeholder £69,348.50 in costs under section 88 of CLARA, because the RTM company was estopped from denying liability after it failed to acquire the right to manage.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | RTM company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Roquefort Properties Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | not stated |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | £69,348.50 |
| Fees or costs ordered | the applicant to pay the respondent costs of £69,348.50 under section 88 of CLARA |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
Respondent : Roquefort Properties Limited
- outcome
The tribunal determines that the Applicant shall pay to the Respondent costs in the sum of £69,348.50 pursuant to section 88 of the Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002
- total payable
the total costs payable by the Applicant to the Respondent under section 88 of CLARA are £69,348.50.
- costs
the Applicant shall pay to the Respondent costs in the sum of £69,348.50 pursuant to section 88 of the Commonhold and Leasehold Reform Act 2002
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.