52-100 (evens) Wentworth Avenue, Slough, SL2 2DH
CAM/00MD/LDC/2024/0014 · dispensation from consultation · Slough · decided 30 Aug 2024
The Tribunal granted the landlord retrospective dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements for emergency drainage repairs at 54 and 56 Wentworth Avenue, without deciding whether the costs are reasonable or payable.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Places for People Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2022 |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
Applicant : [name] for People Limited
- years
In November 2022, the party herein referred to as the “Applicant” was notified of a drainage obstruction
- outcome
The Tribunal grants the application for retrospective dispensation from further statutory consultation in respect of the works as described below.
- s20
The Tribunal consequently grants dispensation from the remaining consultation requirements of section 20 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.