51 Woodford Road, South Woodford, London E18 2ED
LON/00BC/LSC/2019/0262 · service charges · Redbridge · decided 9 Jan 2020
The tribunal found that no service charges are currently payable for the proposed replacement of the two lifts, as the works were not shown to be necessary or within the repairing obligation in the leaseholders' agreements.
| Outcome | Not payable |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | Ferndown Residents Association Limited |
| Managing agent | Strettons Limited |
| Building | An estate, 24 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | other |
| Items disallowed or reduced | other |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
housing a total of 24 flats
- freeholder
The freeholder is Southern Land Securities Limited.
- management company
the holder of one share in the Ferndown Residents Association Limited
- agent
The applicant’s managing agents, Strettons Limited (‘Strettons’)
- outcome
No service charges are currently payable in respect of the proposed lift replacement at the Property.
- items reduced
No service charges are currently payable in respect of the proposed lift replacement at the Property.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.