51 Heathgate, Norwich NR3 1PQ
CAM/33UC/LSC/2018/0069 · service charges · Norwich · decided 24 Apr 2019
figures not yet checkedThe tribunal dismissed the leaseholder's challenge to major concrete repair and railing works charged for 2016–17, finding no basis to dispute the actual costs, and the dismissal also covers any section 20C application.
| Outcome | Dismissed or struck out |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not clear |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | Norwich City Council |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2016 |
| Items in dispute | major works, repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- years
service charge year 2016–17 in respect of qualifying
- outcome
the tribunal considers the application hopeless and, unsupported either by evidence or coherent argument, without merit. It stands dismissed.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.