502 Harrow Road, London W9 3QA
LON/00BK/LSC/2025/1063 · service charges · Westminster · decided 31 Jul 2026
The tribunal found the landlord complied with the s.20 consultation for the proposed roof works and that the estimated £34,800 cost is reasonable, and it found the 2019 major works costs payable by the third respondent because a s.20B notice was served in time; no s.20C order was made.
| Outcome | Payable as demanded |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Refused |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | Cadenza Properties Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Aldermartin Baines & Cuthber Estates |
| Building | A block · 2 decisions about this building |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2019 |
| Items in dispute | major works |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- agent
employ Aldermartin Baines & Cuthber Estates
- years
only the third respondent was able to challenge the payability of the 2019 major works costs
- outcome
all sums demanded in respect of those works are payable.
- s20c
declines to make any order under s.20C of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.