50 Storthwoood Court, Storth Lane, Ranmoor, Sheffield, S10 3HP
MAN/00CG/LSC/2019/0025 · service charges · Sheffield · decided 4 Feb 2020
The tribunal found the landlord complied with the section 20 consultation requirements for the major works, so the leaseholder must pay the disputed £7268.66 and no section 20C order was made.
| Outcome | Payable as demanded |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Refused |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | Storthwood Housing Management Co Ltd |
| Managing agent | Omnia estates |
| Building | One flat |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2019 |
| Items in dispute | major works |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | £7,268.66 |
| Total found payable | £7,268.66 |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- management company
The Respondent to the application is Storthwood Housing Management Co Ltd
- agent
The managing agents appointment by the Respondent is Omnia estates
- years
2019 in respect of 50 Storthwood Court, Ranmoor, Sheffield
- outcome
The Applicant is liable to pay the sum of £7268.66, being the disputed
- total demanded
The Applicant is liable to pay the sum of £7268.66, being the disputed
- total payable
The Applicant is liable to pay the sum of £7268.66, being the disputed
- s20c
No order is made pursuant to Section 20C of the Landlord & tenant Act
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.