50 Buckingham Road, Brighton, BN1 3RQ
HAV/00ML/LDC/2025/0704 · dispensation from consultation · Brighton and Hove · decided 26 Sep 2025
The tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements for urgent additional roof repairs to the rear main pitched roof, conditional on sending a copy of the decision to all leaseholders, without deciding whether the costs are reasonable or payable.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | 50 Buckingham Road Residents Ltd |
| Management company | Buckingham Road Residents Ltd |
| Managing agent | Austin Rees Ltd |
| Building | A block |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
Owned by 50 Buckingham Road Residents Ltd .
- agent
Representative : Austin Rees Ltd
- outcome
The Applicant is granted dispensation under Section 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
- s20
The Applicant is granted dispensation under Section 20ZA of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 from the consultation requirements imposed on the landlord
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.