5 Trefusis Terrace, Exmouth, Devon, EX8 2AX
CHI/18UB/LAM/2023/0004 · appointment of a manager · East Devon · decided 20 Oct 2023
The tribunal refused the leaseholder's application to appoint a manager for 5 Trefusis Terrace and also refused his application that the landlord's costs of the proceedings be excluded from the service charge.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Refused |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | Five Trefusis Terrace Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Modbury Estates Limited |
| Building | One flat, 5 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | management fees, repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
There are only the five dwellings and any funds must be generated from the lessees of those
- freeholder
Respondent : Five Trefusis Terrace Limited
- agent
the Respondent had been in regular contact with Modbury Estates Limited, Mr [name] company, since May 2023
- outcome
The Applicant’s application for the appointment of a manager is refused.
- s20c
The Applicants applications that the costs of the proceedings are not recoverable as service charges or administration charges are refused.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.