5 Oakhall Drive, Sunbury on Thames, Middlesex TW16 7LD
CHI/43UH/LSC/2020/0116 · service charges · Spelthorne · decided 8 Mar 2021
The tribunal found the buildings insurance premiums for 2018/19 to 2020/21 excessive and set reasonable figures for the block, and it made a section 20C order so the landlord cannot add its costs of the case to the service charge.
| Outcome | Reduced |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Order made |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | Grandglobe Ventures Ltd |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 4 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2019, 2020 |
| Items in dispute | insurance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
The property comprises a block of four purpose built maisonettes constructed in the 1990s.
- freeholder
Respondent: Grandglobe Ventures Ltd
- years
2019/2020: £495.32 (for the Block of Four Maisonettes)
- outcome
The Tribunal determines that the insurance premiums as set out below for the years in dispute are not unreasonable:
- s20c
The Tribunal allows the Applicant’s application (and it applies to all four Lessees of the Block) under Section 20c of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.