Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Decisions near EN5 1LS

5 Highpoint, Lyonsdown Road, Barnet EN5 1LS

LON/00AC/LSC/2024/0713 · service charges · Barnet · decided 2 Mar 2026

The tribunal barred the respondent from further participation for failing to comply with directions and co-operate, and found the service charges of £4,986.30 for 2023 to 2025 payable and reasonable, plus £330 in fees.

OutcomePayable as demanded
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Not applied for
Section 20 consultationNot in issue
Who appliedLandlord or management company
Freeholder / landlordLyonsdown Road Property Management Company Limited
Management companyLyonsdown Road Property Management Company Limited
Managing agentRP Property Management
BuildingOne flat
Service charge years in dispute2023
Items in disputelegal and professional fees
Items disallowed or reducednone stated
Total demanded£4,986.30
Total found payable£4,986.30
Fees or costs orderedRespondent to pay Applicant £330 in issue and hearing fees

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

freeholder
Applicant : Lyonsdown Road Property Management
agent
RP Property Management
years
(i) Service charges for the year ending 31 March 2023, in the sum of
outcome
the sum of £4,986.30 is payable by the
total demanded
The sums claimed in the application form totalled £4,986.30.
total payable
the sum of £4,986.30 is payable by the
costs
the Respondent must pay to the Applicant the sum of £330

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.