5 Gomer Court, Broadsands Drive, Gosport, Hants PO12 2SE
CHI/24UF/LDC/2023/0113 · dispensation from consultation · Gosport · decided 26 Oct 2023
The Tribunal granted the landlord dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements for urgent works to replace a lintol over the patio doors of Flat 5 and to strengthen the roof purlins, with no determination on whether the costs are reasonable or payable.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | Proxim Property Management Ltd |
| Building | One flat, 12 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | major works |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
Purpose built (circa 1960's) block of 12 flats.
- agent
Representative : Proxim Property Management Ltd
- outcome
The Tribunal therefore grants dispensation from the consultation requirements of S.20 Landlord and Tenant Act 1985
- s20
The Tribunal therefore grants dispensation from the consultation requirements of S.20 Landlord and Tenant Act 1985 in respect of the replacement of lintol over the patio doors of Flat 5 and strengthening of purlins in the roof.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.