5 Dibleys, Blewbury, Didcot, OX11 9PT
CAM/38UE/LSC/2025/0640 · service charges · Vale of White Horse · decided 27 May 2026
The tribunal held that the applicant is taken to have admitted service charges up to 30 September 2022, that directors and officers insurance is not recoverable under the lease, that garage door and window repairs and a French drain repair may be recovered, and that the roof and window apportionments are fair and proportionate.
| Outcome | Reduced |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not clear |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | Dibleys Heritage Ltd |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | An estate |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2019, 2025 |
| Items in dispute | administration charges, insurance, legal and professional fees, other, repairs and maintenance, reserve fund |
| Items disallowed or reduced | insurance, other, reserve fund |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | No order for reimbursement to the applicant of the application and hearing fee |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
Respondents Dibleys Heritage Ltd
- years
The Applicant challenges the payability and reasonableness of service charges for the years ending 2019 through to 2025.
- outcome
The Tribunal determines that the Applicant’s roof and window apportionment is fair and proportionate;
- items reduced
The Tribunal determines that directors and officers insurance does not fall within [name] 5 of the lease as a service charge cost or expense.
- costs
No order for reimbursement to the Applicant of the application and hearing fee, given the relative preponderance of success of the Respondent on the findings in this decision and all other circumstances.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.