Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Decisions near AL8 6QA

5 Asquith House Guessens Road Welwyn Garden City AL8 6QA

CAM/26UL/LSC/2019/0076 · service charges · Welwyn Hatfield · decided 15 May 2020

The tribunal found the estimated 2019/2020 Scheme Manager charge of £285.96 per leaseholder reasonable and payable, and made an order that the landlord's costs of these proceedings cannot be added to the service charge.

OutcomePayable as demanded
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Order made
Section 20 consultationNot in issue
Who appliedLeaseholder(s)
Freeholder / landlordCatalyst Housing Ltd
Management companynone named
Managing agentnone named
BuildingOne flat
Service charge years in dispute2019
Items in disputeother
Items disallowed or reducednone stated
Total demandednot stated as one figure
Total found payablenot stated as one figure
Fees or costs orderedno order for reimbursement of the application fee or hearing fee

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

freeholder
Respondent : Catalyst Housing Ltd
years
The estimated service charge costs of £285.96 per annum per leaseholder in respect of the Scheme Manager for 2019/2020
outcome
are costs which are reasonably incurred by the Respondent and in a reasonable sum
s20c
not to be regarded as relevant costs to be taken into account in determining the amount of any
costs
No order is made for reimbursement of the application fee or hearing fee.

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.