5 & 10 Penlee House, Claremont Avenue, Woking, Surrey, GU22 7SG
CHI/43UM/LSC/2022/0093 · service charges · Woking · decided 27 Feb 2023
figures not yet checkedThe Tribunal decided that Flats 5 and 10 are liable only for one tenth of the allowable service charge expenditure for 2012 to 2021, so amounts charged above that share were wrongly calculated.
| Outcome | Reduced |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Refused |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | Penlee House Ltd |
| Management company | Penlee House Ltd |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 10 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2012, 2021 |
| Items in dispute | other |
| Items disallowed or reduced | other |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
It consists of 10 flats on two floors.
- freeholder
The freehold is now vested in the Respondent Company, Penlee House Ltd, a company
- management company
where the Respondent is a small resident-controlled management company.
- years
for each of the service charge years 2012 through to 2021 is one tenth
- outcome
the service charge has been wrongly calculated
- items reduced
the service charge has been wrongly calculated
- s20c
The Tribunal does not consider, in any event,
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.