5-8 Frognal Mansions, 97 Frognal, London NW3 6XT
LON/00AG/LDC/2025/0767 · dispensation from consultation · Camden · decided 5 Nov 2025
The tribunal granted the landlord unconditional dispensation from the statutory consultation requirements for urgent brickwork and gutter repairs at the building, while stating this does not decide whether the costs are reasonable.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Refused (from the later costs ruling on this case, linked below) |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | Frognal Mansions (5-8) Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2023 |
| Items in dispute | repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | £11,694 |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
Applicant : [name] Mansions (5-8) Limited
- outcome
The tribunal dispenses unconditionally with those of the consultation requirements not already complied with
- total demanded
The total cost of the brickwork and gutter repair works, including scaffolding, was £11,694 spread between the Respondents.
- s20
The tribunal dispenses unconditionally with those of the consultation requirements not already complied with
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
Later rulings on the same case (costs, section 20C, permission to appeal): 28 Nov 2025.
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.