49A Hainault Avenue, Westcliff-on-Sea, Essex SS0 9HA
CAM/00KF/LSC/2019/0008 · service charges · Southend-on-Sea · decided 29 Apr 2019
figures not yet checkedThe tribunal allowed the insurance premium and meter cabinet charges, reduced the management and accountancy fees and the asbestos survey cost, and made an order under section 20C that the landlord's costs of the proceedings cannot be added to the service charge.
| Outcome | Reduced |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Order made |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | Unipro Projects Limited |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2018 |
| Items in dispute | insurance, management fees, other |
| Items disallowed or reduced | management fees, other |
| Total demanded | not stated as one figure |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
Respondents : Unipro Projects Limited
- years
in respect of the period 2018/19.
- outcome
the reasonable amount is £450.00 plus VAT.
- items reduced
the reasonable amount is £450.00 plus VAT.
- s20c
For these reasons we grant the Applicant’s application for an order that the Respondent’s costs of these proceedings may not be included
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.