49 Crowborough Road, Southend on Sea, Essex SS2 6LW
CAM/00KF/LSC/2019/0009 · service charges · Southend-on-Sea · decided 14 May 2019
The tribunal found the £820 decoration charge reasonable and payable and the £360 cost of the s.20 notice recoverable, but refused the County Court costs and £200 of unevidenced expenses, and granted dispensation from the consultation requirements.
| Outcome | Reduced |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Dispensation granted |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 2 flats · 2 decisions about this building |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | administration charges, legal and professional fees, other, repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | legal and professional fees, other |
| Total demanded | £820 |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
converted into two flats
- outcome
The expenses of £200 claimed are not recoverable as they are not evidenced.
- items reduced
The court costs of £300 are not recoverable in the Tribunal.
- total demanded
seeking her share of the works, namely £820
- s20
The Tribunal gives dispensation pursuant to LTA 1985, s 20ZA.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.