Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Decisions near SS2 6LW

49 Crowborough Road, Southend on Sea, Essex SS2 6LW

CAM/00KF/LSC/2019/0009 · service charges · Southend-on-Sea · decided 14 May 2019

The tribunal found the £820 decoration charge reasonable and payable and the £360 cost of the s.20 notice recoverable, but refused the County Court costs and £200 of unevidenced expenses, and granted dispensation from the consultation requirements.

OutcomeReduced
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Not applied for
Section 20 consultationDispensation granted
Who appliedLandlord or management company
Freeholder / landlordnot a company, or not stated
Management companynone named
Managing agentnone named
BuildingA block, 2 flats · 2 decisions about this building
Service charge years in disputenot stated
Items in disputeadministration charges, legal and professional fees, other, repairs and maintenance
Items disallowed or reducedlegal and professional fees, other
Total demanded£820
Total found payablenot stated as one figure
Fees or costs orderednone stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

flats n
converted into two flats
outcome
The expenses of £200 claimed are not recoverable as they are not evidenced.
items reduced
The court costs of £300 are not recoverable in the Tribunal.
total demanded
seeking her share of the works, namely £820
s20
The Tribunal gives dispensation pursuant to LTA 1985, s 20ZA.

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.