48A High Street, Newport, Isle of Wight, PO30 1SE
HAV/00MW/LAC/2025/0604 · administration charges · Isle of Wight · decided 5 Mar 2026
figures not yet checkedThe tribunal found the cost of the building repair works, two thirds of £7947.00 (£5298.00), reasonable and payable by the leaseholder, granted dispensation from the section 20 consultation requirements, and made an order that the landlord cannot recover the costs of these proceedings through the service charge.
| Outcome | Other decision |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Order made |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | A block, 4 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | major works, repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | £5,298 |
| Total found payable | £5,298 |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- freeholder
Finematch Ltd
- total demanded
The tribunal finds that the amount sought for the works was £5298.00.
- s20c
The tribunal therefore makes an order under these two provisions preventing the landlord from demanding costs of these proceedings either by service charge or by administrative charge.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.