48 Mawney Close, Romford, RM7 8EJ
LON/00AR/LSC/2023/0150 · service charges · Havering · decided 10 Jun 2024
The tribunal reduced the service charge demanded for estate roof, decoration and repair works from £22,744.69 to £20,909.31, removing brick guards, a rubbish chute and part of chimney scaffolding, and refused the leaseholder's section 20C and fee reimbursement requests and the landlord's rule 13 costs application.
| Outcome | Reduced |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Refused |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Leaseholder(s) |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat, 48 flats |
| Service charge years in dispute | 2021 |
| Items in dispute | insurance, other, repairs and maintenance |
| Items disallowed or reduced | other |
| Total demanded | £22,744.69 |
| Total found payable | £20,909.31 |
| Fees or costs ordered | none stated |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- flats n
there are 12 blocks with a total of 48 flats on the estate
- years
planned estate works carried out by the Respondent, and completed in around December 2021
- outcome
we reduce the amount payable to £20,909.31, which we consider is the reasonable cost of the Works
- items reduced
Brick guards reduced from £1,264.25 to zero
- total demanded
The Tribunal determines that the £22,744.69 claimed by the Respondent
- total payable
we reduce the amount payable to £20,909.31
- s20c
The Tribunal refuses Mrs [name] section 20C application.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.