47 Sherborne Avenue, Enfield, EN3 5BW
LON/00AK/LSC/2020/0058 · service charges · Enfield · decided 15 Feb 2021
figures not yet checkedThe tribunal found the respondent liable to pay the window replacement charges and the other challenged service charges as reasonable, and awarded statutory interest of £342.42 on top of the judgment sum.
| Outcome | Not stated |
|---|---|
| Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case) | Not applied for |
| Section 20 consultation | Not in issue |
| Who applied | Landlord or management company |
| Freeholder / landlord | not a company, or not stated |
| Management company | none named |
| Managing agent | none named |
| Building | One flat |
| Service charge years in dispute | not stated |
| Items in dispute | major works, other |
| Items disallowed or reduced | none stated |
| Total demanded | £20,034.84 |
| Total found payable | not stated as one figure |
| Fees or costs ordered | the respondent to reimburse the applicant's issue fee of £916.98 |
Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.
What the decision says
- total demanded
in the claim form the Applicant limits the claim to the lesser sum of £20,034.84
- costs
None has been claimed by the Applicant save for the issue fee of £916.98 and these were allowed by the Tribunal.
The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].
The original
If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).
Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.
Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.