Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Decisions near SR2 0DX

47 Edgemond Court, Sunderland, SR2 0DX

· other · Sunderland · decided 6 May 2020

The tribunal determined that the respondent must pay the applicant's leasehold enfranchisement costs of £636 plus VAT for legal work, £500 plus VAT for valuation and £30 disbursements, after reducing the claimed amounts.

OutcomeOther decision
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Not applied for
Section 20 consultationNot in issue
Who appliedLandlord or management company
Freeholder / landlordnot a company, or not stated
Management companynone named
Managing agentAndrew Craig Property Management
BuildingOne flat, 5 flats
Service charge years in disputenot stated
Items in disputelegal and professional fees
Items disallowed or reducedlegal and professional fees
Total demandednot stated as one figure
Total found payablenot stated as one figure
Fees or costs orderedthe respondent to pay the applicant legal costs of £636 plus VAT, valuation costs of £500 plus VAT and disbursements of

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

freeholder
Respondent : [name] Limited
agent
Representative : [name] Property Management
outcome
Costs of £636 plus VAT (legal) and £500 plus VAT (valuation) together with disbursements of £30, are payable by the Respondent to the Applicant pursuant to section 60(1)
costs
Costs of £636 plus VAT (legal) and £500 plus VAT (valuation) together with disbursements of £30, are payable by the Respondent to the Applicant

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.