Service Charge Check
part of Rent Rise Check: rent increases, repayment orders and licensing for renters

← Decisions near CT20 1EW

47 Coolinge Road, Folkstone, Kent CT20 1EW

CHI/29UL/LIS/2021/0005 · LIS · Folkestone and Hythe · decided 19 Jul 2021

figures not yet checked

The tribunal found the 2019/2020 service charges demanded from leaseholders and the on-account 2020/2021 charges reasonable, but limited the landlord's recoverable legal costs of the proceedings against two leaseholders under section 20C.

OutcomePayable as demanded
Section 20C (landlord's costs of the case)Order made
Section 20 consultationNot in issue
Who appliedLandlord or management company
Freeholder / landlordnot a company, or not stated
Management companynone named
Managing agentnone named
BuildingA block, 4 flats
Service charge years in dispute2019, 2020
Items in disputeinsurance, management fees, repairs and maintenance, reserve fund
Items disallowed or reducednone stated
Total demandednot stated as one figure
Total found payablenot stated as one figure
Fees or costs orderednone stated

Read from the decision automatically: a regular-expression pass, then a language model whose every value must quote the decision word for word; the two readings disagreed on something, so these figures haven't been checked yet and are left out of the statistics. Compare with the original.

What the decision says

flats n
converted into four flats
years
regarding the service charges for 2019/2020 [page 27]
outcome
the service charges demanded from the leaseholders for that part of the service charge year 2019/2020 during which the Applicant was the freeholder are reasonable.

The passages each figure was read from, verbatim. People's names are replaced with [name].

The original

If this decision relates to your home and you'd like it removed from this site, email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with the address or the case reference (removal requests).

Spotted an error on this page? Email hello@rentrisecheck.uk with what is wrong; the decision's reference goes in the subject.

Past decisions are not a prediction. Each tribunal decides on the evidence in front of it.